[Robair]

This was in my mail, one of those "forward it on if you agree" things.

$1:

This was written by a construction worker in Fort MacMurray...he sure
makes a lot of sense to me!
Read on...

I work, they pay me. I pay my taxes and the government distributes my
taxes as it sees fit.
In order to earn that pay cheque, I work on a rig site for a Fort Mac
construction project, I am required to pass a random urine test, with
which I have no problem.
What I do have a problem with is the distribution of my
taxes to people who don't have to pass a urine test.
Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare cheque because I
have to pass one to earn it for them ... ?
Please understand - I have no problem with helping people get back on
their feet.

I do on the other hand have a problem with helping someone sit on their
arse drinking beer and smoking dope.
Could you imagine how much money the provinces would save if people had to pass a urine test to get a public assistance cheque ... ?

Please pass this along if you agree or simply delete if you don't.
Hope you will pass it along though, because something has to change in
this country, and soon!

Thoughts? I have no idea what is involved in qualifying for this sort of thing. Never been on pogy or welfare.

[newfette]

haven't we already beaten this to death a few months ago?

[Zipperfish]

I wouldn't take any job where the work descirption involves supervised peeing in a cup.

[newfette]

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

I wouldn't take any job where the work descirption involves supervised peeing in a cup.

cause you'd fail the ensuing test?

[Brenda]

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

I wouldn't take any job where the work descirption involves supervised peeing in a cup.

So you wouldn't be on welfare if you had to, because otherwise, you could not feed your kids?

Although I aplaud your principles, sometimes welfare is just the thing that gets you back on track. If you have sunken so far already, that you need it, why not get rid of all your pride, and pee in a cup?

[Robair]

newfette newfette:

haven't we already beaten this to death a few months ago?

Maybe, I dunno. Where?

[kal]

newfette newfette:

haven't we already beaten this to death a few months ago?

I think so. I remember a discussion about this.

[DrCaleb]

newfette newfette:

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

I wouldn't take any job where the work descirption involves supervised peeing in a cup.

cause you'd fail the ensuing test?

I like Poppyseed Strudel. That would give a false positive for heroin. So would poppyseeds on a bagel.

Which is why I oppose mandatory drug testing for anyone. Or if an prospective employer asks to check my credit references. Why should I have to defend the undefendable?

[martin14]

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

newfette newfette:

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

I wouldn't take any job where the work descirption involves supervised peeing in a cup.

cause you'd fail the ensuing test?

I like Poppyseed Strudel. That would give a false positive for heroin. So would poppyseeds on a bagel.

Which is why I oppose mandatory drug testing for anyone. Or if an prospective employer asks to check my credit references. Why should I have to defend the undefendable?

yeah, i was like that till i hit 30.. it changes.. u get some credit references


pee test for welfare.. good idea..

[Robair]

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

newfette newfette:

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

I wouldn't take any job where the work descirption involves supervised peeing in a cup.

cause you'd fail the ensuing test?

I like Poppyseed Strudel. That would give a false positive for heroin. So would poppyseeds on a bagel.

Which is why I oppose mandatory drug testing for anyone. Or if an prospective employer asks to check my credit references. Why should I have to defend the undefendable?

One could make the argument that if you aren't willing to give up Poppyseed Strudel for a paychek, then you probably aren't in need of welfare...

[mtbr]

Robair Robair:

This was in my mail, one of those "forward it on if you agree" things.

$1:

This was written by a construction worker in Fort MacMurray...he sure
makes a lot of sense to me!
Read on...

I work, they pay me. I pay my taxes and the government distributes my
taxes as it sees fit.
In order to earn that pay cheque, I work on a rig site for a Fort Mac
construction project, I am required to pass a random urine test, with
which I have no problem.
What I do have a problem with is the distribution of my
taxes to people who don't have to pass a urine test.
Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare cheque because I
have to pass one to earn it for them ... ?
Please understand - I have no problem with helping people get back on
their feet.

I do on the other hand have a problem with helping someone sit on their
arse drinking beer and smoking dope.
Could you imagine how much money the provinces would save if people had to pass a urine test to get a public assistance cheque ... ?

Please pass this along if you agree or simply delete if you don't.
Hope you will pass it along though, because something has to change in
this country, and soon!

Thoughts? I have no idea what is involved in qualifying for this sort of thing. Never been on pogy or welfare.

I would agree with it 100%..if I had to cut back on beer drinking and quit smoking to afford my first mortgage you better not be sticking my tax dollars up your friggen nose!

[Benoit]

Robair Robair:

newfette newfette:

haven't we already beaten this to death a few months ago?

Maybe, I dunno. Where?

Ctrl F:

http://www.canadaka.net/modules.php?nam ... ic&t=27496


But to improve Canada consider this:

http://www.etes.ucl.ac.be/BIEN/Index.html

[Zipperfish]

newfette newfette:

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

I wouldn't take any job where the work descirption involves supervised peeing in a cup.

cause you'd fail the ensuing test?

Catastrophically!!!!

Seriously, becasue I don't want some guy watching me piss in a cup. And because if you don't believe me when I tell you that I would never even consider showing up to work in any state other than sober, drug-free and ready to go, then I don't want to work for you.

[DrCaleb]

martin14 martin14:

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

newfette newfette:

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

I wouldn't take any job where the work descirption involves supervised peeing in a cup.

cause you'd fail the ensuing test?

I like Poppyseed Strudel. That would give a false positive for heroin. So would poppyseeds on a bagel.

Which is why I oppose mandatory drug testing for anyone. Or if an prospective employer asks to check my credit references. Why should I have to defend the undefendable?

yeah, i was like that till i hit 30.. it changes.. u get some credit references


pee test for welfare.. good idea..

Umm, I'm well past 30, with excellent credit. My point is, what does it have to do with my ability to do the job?

Do you have any colon polyps, and are they an indicator of your inability to have TPS reports on time and with the proper cover page? How far are you willing to let people intrude on your private life?

Pee test, just for the hell of it - bad.

Robair Robair:

One could make the argument that if you aren't willing to give up Poppyseed Strudel for a paychek, then you probably aren't in need of welfare...

One could also make the argument that false positives could deny welfare to people that might need it.

[newfette]

$1:

are they an indicator of your inability to have TPS reports on time and with the proper cover page?

great movie